Видео

It’s quite simple for any aspect of the hobby - if you’re not going crazy super long range(FPV), need signal to go through stuff like trees or even buildings (FPV), or need to control a large number of models with a lot of complex controls like gears, flaps, lights, smoke, trims, animating a pilot, and non standard control surfaces, etc - just get the number of channels you need and a fit/budget that works from a reputable brand. Anything above the cheapest and worst reviewed radios won’t cut out on you for basic and even pretty advanced models while flying line of sight. I fly 6ch rc helis and have barely needed to use half of the switches on my radio. I realized a lot of the excessive controls and trims are actually meant for older days of flying when the pilot did have to do a lot of trimming and tuning to do mid flight. If you fly with a flight computer (standard with helis) rather than purely mechanical, you absolutely barely need more than basic controls.

Wow that scary

Can you sand when hardened

Can you wear any of these over top of your subscription glasses

Yes, I needed this advice so much. Thank you for discussing the density.

As I know, these planes dont fly anymore.

You can’t get depron anywhere in the USA now sadly

How long do you let it to dry?

Scale model PanAm Boeing 707-320B ruclips.net/video/8YdL-Uq-iko/видео.html

i understand

WE really need john in this time, he knew what it was all about!

THE INTRO MUSIC IS MUCH TOO LOUD!

great footage what year?

When it's the maiden flight coming?

Loved the vid! What was the final dry colour, it looked gray? If so it's not good for over coating a painted panel that you want to protect.

Your 50mm sucker blades doesn’t sound good and it’s about to fly off to your face at 40,000 RPM. Good thing you didn’t bench-test your 50mm sucker. 🤨😅

The big daddy 5inch is the best

I love these suckers!!

Concordsky flew before the concord.

Nice model. But standing behind the model for take-off is a signature of RC modelers who don't fly well in all orientations. I trust that by now you can take off not standing on the runway threshold. :-)

Aeroflot crew: "Next destination..." Soviet passengers: "Oh. It should be London, Berlin, Paris or Rome". Aeroflot crew: "Almaty" Soviet passengers: "BLYAT!!"

Tu-144 is the one with propelers bruhhhhh

Son extraordinaire. Merci pour la vidéo.. 👍👍👌

El monstro sovietico

Do you have to cover it with something to seal it and will decals stick to it? I have the apple barrel matte acrylic.

The Tu-144 here has NASA markings. In the 1990's, we got to borrow one for research. It had been neglected but, was still flyable. NASA fixed it all up, gave it a few upgrades, and a fresh paint job. We returned it to Russia in better condition than we borrowed it.

That is Awesome 👍👍👍👍👍👍

REALLY NOW

John Wayne dodged active service in the American military during WW2 because he was afraid it would compromise his film career. He was an alcoholic coward. Screw him.

Where can I buy?

According to reports from that time, the noise inside the cabin was unbearable. It was almost impossible to hold a conversation with the passenger sitting next to you. Literally you had to shout in his ear.

Brilliant model

1 of the finest aircraft EVER made!

Hi buddy its your old mate Shane the brit. Sorry I lost contact.

TUPOLEV TU-144 and CONCORDE: The first TUPOLEV TU-144 which flew on December 31, 1968 was indeed very similar of Concorde. It was a "proof of concept" model which was the TU-144A. The Soviets realized that this aircraft, which flew very well, could in no way be certified for civilian passenger transport because of its very high approach and landing speed. After a few test flights the Soviets came to the conclusion that another very different plane had to be built, the TU-144A was scrapped and they started to build the others, the TU-144B and after the C and D. Models C and D used important parts in titanium in an epoch metallurgy of this metal was unknown in the west reason why Concorde was only made in steel and aluminum (and this was the reason its cruise and maximum speed are the same and limited to mach 2 while the TU144 having its critical parts in titanium could cruise at mach 2.2 with a top speed of mach 2.35) . Double delta wings with strait leading edges would make easier to implement slats. Having engines near the center line close to the cabin it liberates the wing trailing hedge (a wingspan of 28.8 meters and 507 m² of wing area to be compared to 25.6 meters and 358 m² for Concorde) making it possible to have the significantly larger flaps all along the trailing edge that were necessary as having low speed in approach and landing that was the goal. Landing speed of Concorde was 305 km/h (165 kts) to be compared to 270km/h (146 kts) for the Tupolev that was indeed very similar of the Boeing 747 that was at time the fastest commercial plane landing. Another important difference was the width of the cabin more comfortable allowed the TU144 to have five seats up front while the Concorde only had four with seats next to the window being uncomfortable, only for people of below average height. Concorde flew in march 4, 1969 and Westerners (French and English) came to the same conclusions as the first version of soviets, it had a very high approach and landing speed, another plane had to be made. The French agreed to build another aircraft but the British did not. The new labor government led by new prime minister Harold Wilson begun to reorganize (and partly nationalize) the entire British aviation industry in what became later British Aerospace with the cancellation of many ongoing and operational projects. Cancelation of the TSR2 aircraft project (Supersonic Tactical & Reconnaissance Bomber) few weeks after its first flight was a serious blow to the Concorde project as it had the same Olympus 593 Concorde engines and had an early version of electric commands a kind of fly by wire but still of analog technology to be implemented in Concorde among other innovations. For the English a design of a new Concorde plane was not possible, they had to continue with the Concorde as it was in the state it was, with all its faults and problems due to design flaws, or else cancel it as the English wanted. The British government did everything to cancel the project, which was firmly opposed by French President George Pompidou. In February 1973 the Concorde project was virtually dead and in the process of being definitively cancelled. It was then the French president embarked to Azores in prototype number three on what is called the flight of last chance to Concorde for a meeting requested by the US President Richard Nixon. Nixon asked the French President to stop converting into gold each dollar entering in France because the US exits the Brenton Woods agreements and the dollar will no longer be convertible on the fixed price agreed in 1947. For his part, George Pompidou explained to Nixon the problem of the Concorde and the danger of having a more efficient Soviet competitor thanks to the use of new metals such as titanium. It was decided to continue the Concorde project as it was the first prototype, but a special committee was created to adopt a very special (and extremely expensive) approach and landing procedures were adopted especially for supersonic planes (but actually only for the Concorde). On approach it was necessary to create a gap in front of the Concorde, which made it impossible for 4 and sometimes 5 planes to land, which were sent to turn around or to a waiting circuit. In all air control centers, priority had to be given to the Concorde, it often arrived at its destination with just ten minutes of fuel in reserve, which was a safety aberration, all regulations require it to land with at least 45 minutes reserve. The French and British governments would pay enormous compensation, this was the price of prestige. Among other several design flaws one was the very great exposure of the kerosene tanks to projections from the landing gear were even the cause of many incidents but three accidents with significant leakage of kerosene, two in 1979, one in Dakar and the other in Washington/Dulles. In November 1981, the American National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) sent a letter of concern to the French BEA that included safety recommendations for Concorde. This communiqué was the result of the NTSB's investigations of four Air France Concorde incidents during a 20-month period from July 1979 to February 1981. The NTSB described those incidents as "potentially catastrophic," because they were caused by blown tyres during takeoff. During its 27 years in service, Concorde had about 70 tyre- or wheel-related incidents, seven of which caused serious damage to the aircraft or were potentially catastrophic. The most serious accident was in July 2000 in Gonesse (France) that caused 113 deaths and marked the end of the aircraft's prestige. This design flaw could be easily corrected on a second copy in prototype phase but … it didn’t happen . On the TU-144 such an accident would be impossible or would not have had the same consequences, projections from the landing gear were not in line with fuel tanks and these are protected by titanium pieces. IN SHORT : Concorde was an immature project, a version B or other was not possible mainly due to budgetary constraints from the British government, it flew for 27 years below important safety rules authorized through derogation obtained at the highest political level. However Concorde was the first operational plane with an early version of “fly by wire” commands (instead of hydraulics) and this was a great and important innovation in aviation very soon adopted by Airbus. The Tu144 was 11% heavier than Concorde but had 40% more wing surface (canards not included) and this made it having approach and landing speed comparable to existing commercial jets like the Boeing 747 and much lower than Concorde.(GM).

How easy does it sand?

That is just hilarious 😂

Such a trash. More failures per minute than we can imagine.

IS IT FUEL PROOF?

Very nice great vid.

There is only one major problem in this masterpiece : It was not built by ultra light construction techniques .. It is very heavy and that makes it unrealistic in appearance during its flying.. How pitty

Thank you ✝️

This man is crazy

Love how you were dancing during the build. They looks SO GOOD!

Have you thought about making any more to sell, I definitely want one

This TU-144 was so noisy in the cabin that you coul'nt have a normal conversation with your neighbouring fellow. A nice attempt from the soviets to match the western technology. Of course lost it with the unability of the TU-144 to achieve scheduled flights and more over just to achieve flights. Typicall soviets performance claiming a lot, but achieving the least. The Concorde was a real masterpiece and the TU-144 just an "erzats" , a poor unachieved program leading to a technical and commercial disaster.

SIMP to the wife any one ?!?

Awsome !

Clearly Fake.

This bird flew before the Concord.